Name | Triangle Group Practice | ||||||
Address | 2 Morley Road Lewisham London SE13 6DQ | ||||||
Phone | 02083187272 | ||||||
Website | http://www.trianglegroupp | ||||||
Rating | ![]() | ||||||
![]() | ![]() | ||||||
CCG | NHS Lewisham CCG | ||||||
E Prescriptions | Available | ||||||
Status : | Closed | ||||||
Share |
| ||||||
See More Doctors near here |
Name | Triangle Group Practice | ||||||
Address | 2 Morley Road Lewisham London SE13 6DQ | ||||||
Phone | 02083187272 | ||||||
Website | http://www.trianglegroupp | ||||||
Rating | ![]() | ||||||
![]() | ![]() | ||||||
CCG | NHS Lewisham CCG | ||||||
E Prescriptions | Available | ||||||
Status : | Closed | ||||||
Share |
| ||||||
See More Doctors near here |
GP Information |
Triangle Group Practice is a GP Practice in London and provides a list of services listed below if available. This GP practice has 38 reviews with a rating of 2.5 out of 5 and a CQC rating of Requires improvement. |
Day | Opening Times | |||
Mon | 08:00-18:30 | |||
Tue | 07:00-18:30 | |||
Wed | 08:00-20:00 | |||
Thu | 08:00-18:30 | |||
Fri | 08:00-18:30 |
GP Services | ||||
|
GP Performance | |||||
The table below is a standard list of gp practice metrics that are complied annually for practices in England. You can use this list to see how Triangle Group Practice is doing in areas that may be important to you. |
Health Metric | Detail | Indicator |
---|---|---|
Cervical Screening Ages 25 to 49 | 950 individuals have been screened out of a possible 1305 eligible people.A total of 72.79693487 of possible patients have been screened which is below the 80% requirement. The GP practice needs to sceen another people to hit the required 80% screening target. | 950 |
Cervical Screening Ages 50 to 64 | 510 individuals have been screened out of a possible 670 eligible people.A total of 76.11940299 of possible patients have been screened which is below the 80% requirement. The GP practice needs to sceen another people to hit the required 80% screening target. | 510 |
Overall number of GP appointments | 2616 Number of appointments in Apr 2024 from a practice list size of 6615 patients | 2616 |
Face to face appointments | 1362 Face to Face appointments in Apr 2024 which is 52.1% of the total number of appointments. | 1362 |
Home Visits | 0 Home Visits in Apr 2024 which is 0% of the total number of appointments. | 0 |
Telephone appointments | 776 Telephone appointments in Apr 2024 which is 29.7% of the total number of appointments. | 776 |
Unknown appointments | 0 Unknown appointments in Apr 2024 which is 0% of the total number of appointments. | 0 |
Video call appointments | 478 Video call appointments in Apr 2024 which is 18.3% of the total number of appointments. | 478 |
Excellent | 9 |
Good | 4 |
Ok | 3 |
Poor | 4 |
Terrible | 19 |
| ![]() | ||||||
Dr Mary Jane is very good I have found this for real, but the surgery last 15 years, normally icy by Dr Mary Jane with my family, my wife and my daughter very happy from this doctor. She always check in very good and give him the right medication as she is very polite. |
| ![]() | ||||||
Tried complaining about this practice so many times they simply aren’t interested. There’s one particular receptionist mentioned throughout who should have been dismissed years ago why they haven’t is inexplicable. Perhaps she is blackmailing them. Official NHS reviews on NHS.uk are pointless as you cannot say anything truthful that’s negative without them refusing to publish it saying you need to make a complaint even though those aren’t dealt with. They are effectively whitewashing the truth from patient experience and making out the practice are wonderful. The truth is the receptionist mentioned elsewhere has the attitude of a prison guard, and gives good GP receptionists a bad name. Mr Smith and doctors wake up and smell the coffee why do you think your CQC rating stated requires improvement when it comes to being well led? And do you really find it appropriate to have a receptionist shouting confidential information in the reception area appropriate, or denying patients from using the patient toilet because she doesn’t want them to even when they are disabled, even telling them to use the pods in the market, hospital, or ones at the shopping centre instead. Then smirking to herself behind the desk screens while they wait believing someone is in there until they have to leave because she doesn’t want to unlock it. Why does a toilet need to be locked with a key overnight anyway beyond pettiness or because someone might actually use it and it require cleaning? |
| ![]() | ||||||
Once again the receptionist is unhelpfull. |